Hi Dears I tried to block some items from purchasing and transferring like the picture below. After that , the item is not allowed to be ordered by purchase as i wished. But it is allowed to be ordered by transfer whereas the item is expected to show error while creating Transfer order. How to block creating any transter order for that item? Thank you
↧
Forum Post: Transfer block
↧
Forum Post: RE: Transfer block
Enerel.lkh, please, write the version & country
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Transfer block
This blocking functionality is not standard NAV, it's some partner's customization. Some two months ago, you posted a question about this functionality here: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/f/users/96402/block-items-for-purchase-and-transfer One of the screenshots in that post shows a table "Item Status Link" with ID 10001404. This ID is a clear sign that this is an ISV solution. So the first question would be - which solution are you using? But since it's not standard, chances of finding an answer in forums are rather low anyway. It's better to address this question to a Microsoft partner supporting your implementation.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Transfer block
A small update to my previous reply. This page (along with the functionality it controls) apparently belongs to LS Retail. Probably this could be a starting point for the search.
↧
Forum Post: MRP in planning worksheet
Hello Navision users , I created a production order of a FG item, with 2 items in its BOM, and I don't have those 2 raw materials in my inventory , so I'm supposed to have a suggestion of a purchase order of those items in the planning worksheet , but I don't have them. I don't know what is the problem , because when I created a new purchase requisition and calculated the planning the items showed in purchase requisition , I don't know why they don't appear in the planning worksheet . thank you
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
What setup do you have for calculation? I think you can attach the screenshot + what status of production order do you have?
↧
Forum Post: RE: Nav web client, You dont have access to Microsoft Dynamics NAV
Are you able to access or use the web client with other users? Are you on the latest NAV 2013 R2 build?
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
the production order is planned firm , for the finished good (TPF1), the reorder policy is order , the manufacturing policy is make to order , for the raw materials (TMP1 & TMP2) the reoder policy is lot for lot fixed reorder quantity for TMP1 and lot for lot for TMP2 TMP1 and TMP2 are supposed to appear in the planning worksheet
↧
Forum Post: RE: Councurrent sessions in D365 Business Central
No. If there are no more concurrent users, then the user must wait until a user disconnects. If using the web client, then sessions are automatically disconnected after a timeout. But why do you ask about concurrent users and Business Central. With Business Central, no matter if you talk about On-Premise or SaaS, then your only option is named users. Any existing Dynamics NAV licenses needs to by migrated to BC named users (where you get 2 named for each concurrent users assigned to the license before October 2018). Your only other option is to stay on NAV 2018. The date to buy new NAV 2018 licenses has already passed (March 31st 2019), so that's only if we talk about an existing NAV license.
↧
↧
Comment on One more quick notice about BC CU06
I actually noticed the same (!). My guess was that these are just internal codes used during builds. If you have access to the insider builds, then they look quite different depending on (my guess) which branch it comes from.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Data Migration NAV 2009 Export to Excel error
Hi Mathan, You have not told us the context of your question. When are you getting this error? In a production environment or a local test/development installation? Do you get the same error on different machines? Which client are you using Classic or RTC? NAV 2009 is an old release. If you experience technical issues like this, then always make sure to test it locally on the newest build. Running a supported OS version always helps. DLL's can generally be tricky, you need to be on the right version. Could it be a matter of codepage issues? NAV 2009 was not unicode and not very good at handling different codepages. In Denmark we have a number of special characters like ÆØÅ - where especially Ø could mess up everything if we Windows was not set natively support Danish characters.
↧
Forum Post: Dot Net Variables in NAS
Dear Sir, I'm facing a problem with the DotNet variable in NAS Environment (NAV 2016). I have declared all the DotNet variables in a Codeunit to convert the WORDLAYOUT of a Report output into a HTML file. After that the Codeunit send the same HTML file in a email body. It's working fine when I execute the Codeunit manually. It creates WORD file, converts it into HTML and then send the same HTML in the body of the email. During manual execution I have to declare all the DotNet variable as RunOnClient YES . And in NAS Environment I have declared the same DotNet variables as RunOnClient No . The piece of the Custom Code is as follows.... WordApplication :=WordApplication.ApplicationClass; WordDocument :=WordHelper.CallOpen(WordApplication,FileName,FALSE,TRUE); FileName2 := TEMPORARYPATH + DELCHR(FORMAT(CURRENTDATETIME),'=','\/:*?"<>| '); WordHelper.CallSaveAsFormat(WordDocument,FileName2,WordSaveFormat.wdFormatHTML); The NAS has found null value in the first parameter of "CallSaveAsFormat" function and hence it gives the following error message. Microsoft Dynamics NAV A call to Microsoft.Dynamics.Nav.Integration.Office.Word.WordHelper.CallSaveAsFormat failed with this message: Value cannot be null. Parameter name: document OK I can't find the reason why it is doing so in NAS. If you have any idea about the same please reply. Thank you, Subrata Bauri
↧
Forum Post: RE: Dot Net Variables in NAS
Will NAS be able to execute the following C/AL code on NAV 2016 ? WordApplication :=WordApplication.ApplicationClass; WordDocument :=WordHelper.CallOpen(WordApplication,FileName,FALSE,FALSE);
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
Two check questions. Do the component items get planned when you run both MPS + MRP? And is there any demand for these items besides manufacturing (sales or service orders for example)?
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
those items are new , I created them to test , no sales orders for them , and I tried to run the MPS+MRP using forcast , I got results of suggestion of orders for the for the forcast , but no result for the production order
↧
Forum Post: RE: Business central API: How to get the general ledger entries of a posted sale invoice ?
Please verify the answer that helped you. Thank you.
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
One of the items (the one with "fixed reorder qty.") replenishment system has stockkeeping units, so it's hard to say anything about the setup here, since if an SKU required for the production order, exists, its setup will take priority, and item setup is ignored in this case. As for the other item - it should be planned if the demand exists. Check demand for both component items - "Item availability by event" action from the item card.
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
I checked " Item availability by event" , I have a demand for the two raws material items , and I deleted the SKU and recalculated the MRP planning , still no result . thank you for your help
↧
Forum Post: RE: MRP in planning worksheet
Then your setup looks perfectly fine. You are using some customization or an add-on (purchase requisition is not standard NAV functionality). Could it be that this customized function affects requisition planning? Are there any modifications in codenuit 99000854, or table 99000853?
↧
Forum Post: The SQL Server login does not exist on the server
Hello, The server for a Nav 5 implementation that I am working on crashed about a month ago. A new windows 2012 r2 server was created and NAV restored. Several hundred users were added by an administrator, about 700 I think - users dating from 10+ years ago, even if they aren't there now - at that time the syncing worked fine he said. However, as of two days ago they are getting the message mentioned in the subject - but the fact is that the user does actually exist on the sql server. It happens when either a) the admin goes and adds a new user in NAV / database user and also adds the matching user in SSMS, and then goes to "Sync All' or b) it seems to be happening starting with users beginning with 'a' - in other words I think it is not finding ANY user that is listed in NAV database user list in SQL Server, even though they are in SQL Server. NAV is a published Citrix app, I don't know if that is relevant. Windows security update kb4493446 was installed 5 days ago - doubt it's relevant but just mentioning it.
↧